CVR PULSE — INTERNAL
Growth · Analytics · June 12, 2026

Did killing the Intelligems
tests move CVR?

All A/B tests were turned off Wednesday June 11 at ~7pm PT. This report tracks hourly conversion rate before and after — sitewide and on the rise-2 landing page — against the same hours one week earlier.

The Verdict (so far)
Sitewide
No change

CVR was at week-over-week parity before the shutoff (+6%), after the shutoff (+4%), and this morning (roughly flat). Turning off the tests has not measurably moved sitewide conversion in either direction.

Rise-2 page
Watch

Rise-2 ran +22% above last week on its final day with tests on, and is tracking ~18% below parity this morning — on only 19 orders, which is noise territory. If the gap holds on clean data, the test may have been helping. Verdict: tomorrow.

Data quality
False alarm

The scary morning-of numbers ("CVR down 25%") were a measurement artifact, not a real drop. Google Analytics overcounts same-day sessions by ~35% until overnight processing. Details below.

01 — Rise-2 Landing Page

/pages/rise-2

The main paid-traffic landing page (~5,600 sessions/day). Yesterday was its strongest day vs. baseline in the window — with tests still running.

WindowSessionsOrdersCVRSame hours last weekΔ
Wed Jun 11 full day — tests on until 7pm 5,644871.54%1.26% +22%
Thu Jun 12, 12am–10am adjusted intraday ~2,28019~0.83%1.01% −18%

Rise-2 hourly CVR — Jun 11 → Jun 12 vs. one week earlier

3-hour rolling average to smooth single-hour noise (2–8 orders/hr). Dashed line = same hours one week earlier. Marker = tests off, 7pm.

⚠ The counterintuitive signal

The expectation was that removing test overhead would lift rise-2 conversion. The early data points the other way: the page outperformed its weekly baseline while a test was live, and is underperforming since. With only 19 orders this morning this is far from proven — but if it holds through today's full data, the killed rise-2 test was likely a winner and is worth restoring as the default experience.

02 — Sitewide

All traffic, all pages

Sitewide CVR has held week-over-week parity through the entire window — before the shutoff, after it, and this morning. Meta spend was flat (~$24–25k/day) all week, so media isn't confounding the comparison.

WindowSessionsOrdersCVRSame hours last weekΔ
Wed Jun 11, 6am–7pm — tests ON 18,3753401.85%1.74% +6%
Wed Jun 11, 7pm–midnight — tests OFF 5,003741.48%1.41% +4%
Thu Jun 12, 12am–10am adjusted intraday ~9,790157~1.60%1.68% −5% · noise

Sitewide hourly CVR — Jun 11 → Jun 12 vs. one week earlier

3-hour rolling average. Dashed line = same hours one week earlier. Marker = tests off, 7pm.
03 — Why the morning numbers lied

The ~35% phantom-session artifact

The first pull of this data (6am Thursday) showed CVR running 20–25% below last week and a midnight explosion of "Unassigned" traffic. Both were artifacts of how Google Analytics processes data.

What's actually happening

Same-day GA4 data is a rough draft. Google doesn't finish de-duplicating sessions or assigning traffic sources until an overnight batch job. Until then, session counts read ~35% too high (we verified directly: yesterday's 6am hour showed 2,117 sessions in the morning pull, and 1,571 after processing) and 35–40% of traffic shows as "Unassigned."

Inflated sessions mechanically deflate CVR. Same orders ÷ more phantom sessions = a conversion rate that looks 25–35% worse than reality. Comparing today's rough draft against last week's final data will always trigger a false alarm.

House rule going forward: intraday, trust order counts (those are accurate in real time). Judge CVR only on days that have finished processing. Orders this morning: 157 vs. 175 same hours last week — down 10%, within normal daily wobble.

04 — Method & Next Step

Source: GA4 (property 310751693), sessions and transactions by hour, Pacific time. Jun 11 and baseline days (Jun 4–5) are fully processed; Jun 12 is intraday with sessions deflated by the measured 1.36× inflation factor. Intelligems' own analytics API was returning errors at time of writing, so GA4 is the source of record here. Meta spend cross-checked via Ads API: $24.5k (Jun 5) → $25.4k (Jun 11), flat; Jun 12 pacing normally.

Next step: re-run both cuts on fully processed Jun 12 data (Friday morning) for the final rise-2 verdict. If rise-2 is still below parity, pull the killed rise-2 experiment's results from Intelligems and consider shipping its variant as the default.